When a relationship breaks down, disputes over the family home often arise, especially when one party wants to sell the property, and the other wants to keep it. In Australia, if negotiations fail, you may have the option to petition the Family Court to force the sale of the house as part of the property settlement process. The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) empowers the court to make orders to ensure that assets are divided in a just and equitable manner, and this can include forcing the sale of jointly owned property.
This article provides a detailed look at the conditions under which the court may force the sale of a property, how the process works, and key case law that illustrates these principles.
How Does the Court-Enforced Sale of a House Work?
Once the court decides to force the sale of a property, it follows a structured legal process to ensure the sale is conducted fairly. The court will typically issue the following orders to facilitate the sale:
1. Independent Valuation of the Property
The court will often require an independent valuation of the property to ensure that it is sold at a fair market price. The valuation will be conducted by a licensed property valuer who is appointed either by the court or by agreement between the parties. This valuation ensures that the sale proceeds reflect the true value of the home, preventing one party from manipulating the sale price to their advantage.
Case Example: Kane & Kane [2013] FamCA 215
In Kane & Kane, the court ordered the family home to be sold and instructed that it be independently valued to ensure the sale was conducted fairly. The valuation provided a baseline price for the real estate agent tasked with selling the home, ensuring neither party was disadvantaged by an under- or over-valuation.
2. Appointment of a Real Estate Agent
Once the property has been valued, the court will appoint a real estate agent to handle the sale. The agent is responsible for marketing the property, liaising with potential buyers, and negotiating the sale. The appointment of an independent agent helps ensure the process is transparent and impartial, preventing either party from influencing the sale.
3. Court-Ordered Timeframe for the Sale
The court will usually set a timeframe within which the house must be sold. This ensures that the sale process is not unnecessarily delayed, and both parties can move forward with the settlement. If one party continues to obstruct the sale, the court can intervene further by appointing a trustee to complete the sale on their behalf.
Case Example: Bateman & Gaffney [2010] FMCAfam 103
In Bateman & Gaffney, the wife sought to delay the sale of the family home, arguing that it would disrupt her and the children’s lives. However, the court ordered a strict timeframe for the sale, noting that the sale proceeds were necessary to finalise the property settlement and that the wife could use part of the proceeds to secure alternative housing. The case underscores the court’s commitment to ensuring that sales proceed in a timely manner.
What Happens If One Party Refuses to Cooperate?
If one party refuses to sign the necessary documents to facilitate the sale, the court has the power to appoint a trustee to act on their behalf. The trustee is legally authorised to sign the sale documents, manage the transaction, and ensure that the property is sold in compliance with the court’s orders.
Case Example: Weir v Weir [1993] FamCA 100
In Weir, the husband refused to sign the documents needed to sell the family home. The court appointed a trustee to handle the sale on his behalf, effectively removing his ability to delay the process. This case demonstrates that the court has strong powers to ensure compliance and prevent one party from obstructing the settlement.
Conclusion: Forcing the Sale of a House in Australia
In family law matters, forcing the sale of a jointly owned property is a complex process, but it is entirely possible with the intervention of the Family Court. If negotiations with your ex-partner fail and one party refuses to sell, the court can issue an order to facilitate the sale, ensuring a just and equitable settlement. Whether through independent valuation, the appointment of a real estate agent, or the involvement of a trustee, the court has the tools to ensure that the sale proceeds fairly and in a timely manner.
If you find yourself in a situation where your ex-partner is refusing to sell the house or obstructing the process, seeking legal advice early can help you understand your rights and options. A family lawyer can guide you through the legal steps necessary to force the sale and secure your share of the property.
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Disputes after relationships end are uncomfortable but are a regular part of the separation process. If you have previously done some research on Alternative Dispute Resolution, you may have noticed that there are a lot of different types of Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Duty of disclosure in Family Law
All parties involved in a family law dispute are required to provide to each party and the Court all information which is relevant to an issue in the case. If your case involves financial issues, then in addition to general disclosure requirements, you are required to provide full and frank disclosure. If your case relates…
Marriage Separation Checklist Australia
It is useful to use a checklist, particularly when you’re in a heightened state of emotion.
Are assets received post family law separation included in the property settlement?
Family law property settlements are not calculated on the date of separation but at the date of final orders or agreements. That means assets can be included in the property pool even if they get obtained post-separation. It depends on the type of asset as to whether it gets included in the property asset pool.
Should you finalise your financial separation sooner rather than later?
It is no secret those that come out of family law unscathed are those that reached a mutual agreement and formally documented that agreement early. Many separating couples are amicable at some point and agree on things without lawyers. However, it’s at that exact point separating couples need to inject some law into the agreement…
How are loans and gifts considered in family law?
If something is a loan, then it will need to be paid back out of the property pool, whereas the property pool will include gifts. Disputes often arise as to whether an asset or money is a loan or a gift, and then if it is a gift whether or not it is a joint…
How does the family court treat assets and debts incurred after separation?
The Family Court considers debts as genuine if they are for proper purposes. A good purpose might be to move out of the house or to pay for maintenance on an existing asset. If the debt is for gambling or another activity, then that debt is seen to be dissipating the asset pool. If a…
Superannuation, Divorce and Separation
Is my ex de facto/wife/husband entitled to my superannuation? Yes your ex may be entitled to superannuation. In all Australian states (except Western Australia) superannuation is considered an asset in…
Post-Separation Assets
What Happens to Post-Separation Assets? Parties can build up significant assets after separation and should be aware of how those assets are treated in family law proceedings. Property that is…
Spousal Maintenance
What is spousal maintenance? Spousal maintenance is a form of financial support available to a party during a separation. It is usually understood to be payments made to the other…
When Will the Court Order a Forced Sale?
The Family Court does not automatically force the sale of a house simply because one party requests it. However, there are specific circumstances in which the court is likely to make an order for sale. Typically, the court will consider forcing the sale if the following conditions apply:
1. No Other Way to Achieve a Just and Equitable Settlement
If keeping the house would result in an unbalanced division of assets, or if there is no other way to divide the asset pool fairly, the court may decide that selling the property is the best way to ensure a fair settlement. The court is tasked with dividing assets in a way that is just and equitable, not necessarily equal, taking into account both parties’ financial and non-financial contributions to the relationship.
Case Example: Stanford v Stanford [2012] HCA 52
In Stanford, the High Court of Australia emphasised the need for property settlements to be just and equitable. In this case, the court ruled that dividing property fairly sometimes requires the sale of a jointly owned home, particularly if retaining it would lead to a disproportionate benefit for one party. The court will assess whether selling the property is necessary to balance the settlement in light of each party’s contributions and future needs.
2. One Party is in Default of a Court Order
If one party has been ordered by the court to sell the house but refuses to comply, the other party can apply for enforcement of that order. The court has broad powers to enforce compliance, including the forced sale of the property. Failing to comply with a court order, such as failing to make mortgage payments or refusing to cooperate with the sale, can result in the court appointing someone to sell the property on behalf of the non-compliant party.
Case Example: Weir v Weir [1993] FamCA 100
In Weir, the husband refused to cooperate with a court order to sell the family home. The court intervened, appointing a trustee to handle the sale of the property on his behalf. The court’s ruling shows that it will enforce orders to ensure compliance and prevent one party from obstructing the settlement process.
3. The Sale Does Not Affect Either Party’s Ability to Earn Income
The court will assess whether selling the house could negatively affect either party’s ability to earn an income. For example, if one party operates a business from the home, or if the sale would otherwise hinder their capacity to generate income, the court may hesitate to order a sale. However, if neither party’s ability to earn income is significantly affected, the court is more likely to order the sale.
Case Example: Hall & Hall [2016] FamCAFC 161
In Hall & Hall, the wife argued that selling the family home would impact her ability to continue running her home-based business. The court considered whether the sale would disrupt her income but ultimately found that the business could be relocated without causing undue financial harm. The sale was ordered as part of a fair division of the assets.
4. The Party Wanting to Keep the House Cannot Refinance
One of the most common reasons the court orders the sale of a property is that the party wishing to keep the home cannot refinance the mortgage in their own name. When a party expresses a desire to retain the family home, they must provide evidence to the court that they can refinance the property’s debt and pay out the other party’s share of the equity. If they cannot demonstrate this ability, the court may order the sale of the home.
Case Example: Black v Black [2008] FamCA 7
In Black v Black, the husband sought to keep the family home but could not show that he had the financial means to refinance the mortgage in his sole name. The court ordered the sale of the property, ruling that the husband’s inability to manage the mortgage made it impractical for him to keep the house. The proceeds from the sale were then divided between both parties as part of the settlement.
How Does the Court-Enforced Sale of a House Work?
Once the court decides to force the sale of a property, it follows a structured legal process to ensure the sale is conducted fairly. The court will typically issue the following orders to facilitate the sale:
1. Independent Valuation of the Property
The court will often require an independent valuation of the property to ensure that it is sold at a fair market price. The valuation will be conducted by a licensed property valuer who is appointed either by the court or by agreement between the parties. This valuation ensures that the sale proceeds reflect the true value of the home, preventing one party from manipulating the sale price to their advantage.
Case Example: Kane & Kane [2013] FamCA 215
In Kane & Kane, the court ordered the family home to be sold and instructed that it be independently valued to ensure the sale was conducted fairly. The valuation provided a baseline price for the real estate agent tasked with selling the home, ensuring neither party was disadvantaged by an under- or over-valuation.
2. Appointment of a Real Estate Agent
Once the property has been valued, the court will appoint a real estate agent to handle the sale. The agent is responsible for marketing the property, liaising with potential buyers, and negotiating the sale. The appointment of an independent agent helps ensure the process is transparent and impartial, preventing either party from influencing the sale.
3. Court-Ordered Timeframe for the Sale
The court will usually set a timeframe within which the house must be sold. This ensures that the sale process is not unnecessarily delayed, and both parties can move forward with the settlement. If one party continues to obstruct the sale, the court can intervene further by appointing a trustee to complete the sale on their behalf.
Case Example: Bateman & Gaffney [2010] FMCAfam 103
In Bateman & Gaffney, the wife sought to delay the sale of the family home, arguing that it would disrupt her and the children’s lives. However, the court ordered a strict timeframe for the sale, noting that the sale proceeds were necessary to finalise the property settlement and that the wife could use part of the proceeds to secure alternative housing. The case underscores the court’s commitment to ensuring that sales proceed in a timely manner.
What Happens If One Party Refuses to Cooperate?
If one party refuses to sign the necessary documents to facilitate the sale, the court has the power to appoint a trustee to act on their behalf. The trustee is legally authorised to sign the sale documents, manage the transaction, and ensure that the property is sold in compliance with the court’s orders.
Case Example: Weir v Weir [1993] FamCA 100
In Weir, the husband refused to sign the documents needed to sell the family home. The court appointed a trustee to handle the sale on his behalf, effectively removing his ability to delay the process. This case demonstrates that the court has strong powers to ensure compliance and prevent one party from obstructing the settlement.
Conclusion: Forcing the Sale of a House in Australia
In family law matters, forcing the sale of a jointly owned property is a complex process, but it is entirely possible with the intervention of the Family Court. If negotiations with your ex-partner fail and one party refuses to sell, the court can issue an order to facilitate the sale, ensuring a just and equitable settlement. Whether through independent valuation, the appointment of a real estate agent, or the involvement of a trustee, the court has the tools to ensure that the sale proceeds fairly and in a timely manner.
If you find yourself in a situation where your ex-partner is refusing to sell the house or obstructing the process, seeking legal advice early can help you understand your rights and options. A family lawyer can guide you through the legal steps necessary to force the sale and secure your share of the property.
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
